<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (1) TMI 28 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97991</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the application for an extension of time for filing documents was submitted after the allowed period had expired, making it ineligible for consideration. Consequently, the petition was unsuccessful, and the petitioner was directed to cover the costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (1) TMI 28 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97991</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the application for an extension of time for filing documents was submitted after the allowed period had expired, making it ineligible for consideration. Consequently, the petition was unsuccessful, and the petitioner was directed to cover the costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>