<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (12) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97985</link>
    <description>A plea of autrefois acquit barred a second prosecution for failure to file annual returns and balance-sheets under the Companies Act where the earlier case had already ended in acquittal for the same defaulting conduct over an overlapping period. The later complaint did not allege a distinct subsequent default; it rested on the same period of non-compliance and the same factual basis. The court treated the offence as incapable of supporting a fresh prosecution on identical facts merely because the default was described as continuing, and held that the petitioner could not be proceeded against again after acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:16:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (12) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97985</link>
      <description>A plea of autrefois acquit barred a second prosecution for failure to file annual returns and balance-sheets under the Companies Act where the earlier case had already ended in acquittal for the same defaulting conduct over an overlapping period. The later complaint did not allege a distinct subsequent default; it rested on the same period of non-compliance and the same factual basis. The court treated the offence as incapable of supporting a fresh prosecution on identical facts merely because the default was described as continuing, and held that the petitioner could not be proceeded against again after acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>