<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (10) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97983</link>
    <description>A shareholder who knew his name stood in the register or contributories list must act promptly if he wishes to dispute liability; delay, acquiescence, and the intervention of third-party rights bar discretionary rectification after a winding-up order has become final. On the facts, the shareholder&#039;s long-delayed challenge was not maintainable, and deletion from the contributories list was refused. A transfer of shares made after commencement of winding up without the required court sanction is ineffective for registration purposes, and the transferee&#039;s name may be removed from the register. The official liquidator&#039;s challenge succeeded, while the shareholder&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:13:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (10) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97983</link>
      <description>A shareholder who knew his name stood in the register or contributories list must act promptly if he wishes to dispute liability; delay, acquiescence, and the intervention of third-party rights bar discretionary rectification after a winding-up order has become final. On the facts, the shareholder&#039;s long-delayed challenge was not maintainable, and deletion from the contributories list was refused. A transfer of shares made after commencement of winding up without the required court sanction is ineffective for registration purposes, and the transferee&#039;s name may be removed from the register. The official liquidator&#039;s challenge succeeded, while the shareholder&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>