https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97978 The court clarified that Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code confers jurisdiction on civil courts for matters related to the administration of public charitable trusts, distinct from the provisions of the Companies Act. The appeal challenged the lower court's decision to return the case to the company court, asserting that civil courts have authority to address breaches of trust and provide necessary directions for proper administration of charitable trusts. The court ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that beneficiaries can seek court intervention under Section 92, irrespective of the trustee being an individual or a company. The lower court's decision was overturned, and the case was remanded for further proceedings in the civil court. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:09:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97978 The court clarified that Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code confers jurisdiction on civil courts for matters related to the administration of public charitable trusts, distinct from the provisions of the Companies Act. The appeal challenged the lower court's decision to return the case to the company court, asserting that civil courts have authority to address breaches of trust and provide necessary directions for proper administration of charitable trusts. The court ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that beneficiaries can seek court intervention under Section 92, irrespective of the trustee being an individual or a company. The lower court's decision was overturned, and the case was remanded for further proceedings in the civil court. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 17 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97978