<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (9) TMI 32 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97976</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking confirmation of the alteration of a company&#039;s memorandum to include a new business activity related to picture houses and cinemas. The judge found that the proposed business did not align with the existing distilling business of the company and did not provide any advantage or convenience in combination as required by section 17 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, the petition was deemed lacking in merit and was dismissed with costs imposed on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:07:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (9) TMI 32 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97976</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking confirmation of the alteration of a company&#039;s memorandum to include a new business activity related to picture houses and cinemas. The judge found that the proposed business did not align with the existing distilling business of the company and did not provide any advantage or convenience in combination as required by section 17 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, the petition was deemed lacking in merit and was dismissed with costs imposed on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>