<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 562 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97965</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the revenue&#039;s application for rectification of mistake in Final Order No. 699/98-D. The Tribunal upheld the classification of fabrics by M/s. Madura Coats Ltd. under tariff Heading 52.05, dismissing the revenue&#039;s argument for classification under Heading 59.09. The Tribunal emphasized that a mistake apparent on record must be clear and not a matter of legal debate, citing a Supreme Court precedent. Consequently, the application for rectification was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 562 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97965</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the revenue&#039;s application for rectification of mistake in Final Order No. 699/98-D. The Tribunal upheld the classification of fabrics by M/s. Madura Coats Ltd. under tariff Heading 52.05, dismissing the revenue&#039;s argument for classification under Heading 59.09. The Tribunal emphasized that a mistake apparent on record must be clear and not a matter of legal debate, citing a Supreme Court precedent. Consequently, the application for rectification was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>