<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (7) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97963</link>
    <description>Orders directing amendment of a company petition are appealable judgments under clause 15 of the Letters Patent where they conclusively affect the applicant&#039;s ability to obtain relief and are not merely procedural. A composite petition seeking oppression and mismanagement relief under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 is maintainable because the provisions operate in the same field, the procedural rules do not expressly bar joinder, and connected causes of action may be combined. Practical evidentiary difficulties may be addressed through consolidation for trial. The challenged order was set aside, and the composite petition was permitted to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:51:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (7) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97963</link>
      <description>Orders directing amendment of a company petition are appealable judgments under clause 15 of the Letters Patent where they conclusively affect the applicant&#039;s ability to obtain relief and are not merely procedural. A composite petition seeking oppression and mismanagement relief under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 is maintainable because the provisions operate in the same field, the procedural rules do not expressly bar joinder, and connected causes of action may be combined. Practical evidentiary difficulties may be addressed through consolidation for trial. The challenged order was set aside, and the composite petition was permitted to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>