<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (6) TMI 32 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97956</link>
    <description>A liquidator in a winding up represents the company itself, so Rule 23 of the Civil Rules of Practice does not require the liquidator to file a power of attorney or written authority when appearing personally. In a creditors&#039; voluntary winding up, liquidators nominated by the creditors&#039; meeting are validly appointed, and where creditors and the general body nominate different persons, the creditors&#039; choice prevails. Prior sanction is not needed for instituting a suit, because the sanction requirement applies only to the specified powers corresponding to section 457(2)(i) to (iv), not to the power to sue under section 457(1). The note concludes that objections to maintainability failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (6) TMI 32 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97956</link>
      <description>A liquidator in a winding up represents the company itself, so Rule 23 of the Civil Rules of Practice does not require the liquidator to file a power of attorney or written authority when appearing personally. In a creditors&#039; voluntary winding up, liquidators nominated by the creditors&#039; meeting are validly appointed, and where creditors and the general body nominate different persons, the creditors&#039; choice prevails. Prior sanction is not needed for instituting a suit, because the sanction requirement applies only to the specified powers corresponding to section 457(2)(i) to (iv), not to the power to sue under section 457(1). The note concludes that objections to maintainability failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>