<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 549 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97952</link>
    <description>Penalty for Modvat credit reversal was held unwarranted because the legal position on reversal in the relevant circumstances was unsettled and the assessee was not shown to have acted with deliberate intent to evade central excise duty. As the relatable credit had already been reversed and restoration was not sought, penal action was considered unjustified and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 549 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97952</link>
      <description>Penalty for Modvat credit reversal was held unwarranted because the legal position on reversal in the relevant circumstances was unsettled and the assessee was not shown to have acted with deliberate intent to evade central excise duty. As the relatable credit had already been reversed and restoration was not sought, penal action was considered unjustified and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>