<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 546 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing Modvat credit for goods covered by a specific invoice dated 23-3-1996. The Tribunal emphasized that technical lapses should not hinder Modvat credit if goods were received and duty paid, noting the Department&#039;s silence as acceptance of the declaration. However, the Tribunal upheld the debit of Rs. 7,597/- as per the impugned order. The appeal was partly allowed, leading to appropriate consequential actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 546 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing Modvat credit for goods covered by a specific invoice dated 23-3-1996. The Tribunal emphasized that technical lapses should not hinder Modvat credit if goods were received and duty paid, noting the Department&#039;s silence as acceptance of the declaration. However, the Tribunal upheld the debit of Rs. 7,597/- as per the impugned order. The appeal was partly allowed, leading to appropriate consequential actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>