https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97948 A partnership was not invalid merely because one participant acted for a company: the company was a separate legal person, and the statutory bar on an unregistered association or partnership exceeding the prescribed number of persons did not apply on these facts. The deed showed only three individuals as parties, with one signing in a representative capacity. Independently, persistent losses and a serious breakdown in relations between the partners satisfied the grounds for dissolution under the Partnership Act, so dissolution and accounts were properly ordered. en-us Tue, 01 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:40:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97948 A partnership was not invalid merely because one participant acted for a company: the company was a separate legal person, and the statutory bar on an unregistered association or partnership exceeding the prescribed number of persons did not apply on these facts. The deed showed only three individuals as parties, with one signing in a representative capacity. Independently, persistent losses and a serious breakdown in relations between the partners satisfied the grounds for dissolution under the Partnership Act, so dissolution and accounts were properly ordered. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 01 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97948