<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97941</link>
    <description>Notices in the settlement of contributories were treated as valid where they were substantially served and no prejudice from the mode of posting was shown. The managing agent&#039;s remuneration claim was held provable under the agency agreement, but it was reduced on a fair assessment because the company&#039;s business was not carried on during the relevant period. A contributory cannot set off a debt owed by the company against unpaid calls, as call liability is distinct from ordinary debt. The rent claim was accepted, and the calls were either reduced or upheld after taking the reduced remuneration and rejection of set-off into account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97941</link>
      <description>Notices in the settlement of contributories were treated as valid where they were substantially served and no prejudice from the mode of posting was shown. The managing agent&#039;s remuneration claim was held provable under the agency agreement, but it was reduced on a fair assessment because the company&#039;s business was not carried on during the relevant period. A contributory cannot set off a debt owed by the company against unpaid calls, as call liability is distinct from ordinary debt. The rent claim was accepted, and the calls were either reduced or upheld after taking the reduced remuneration and rejection of set-off into account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>