<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97940</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay, in a case concerning rectification of a company&#039;s register of members, addressed the jurisdictional issue of a suit valued at Rs. 1,300 under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court clarified that despite the availability of a summary procedure under section 155, a civil suit remained the primary remedy for such relief. Rejecting the notion to treat the suit as a petition under section 155, the court emphasized the importance of pecuniary jurisdiction, determining that the suit fell below the High Court&#039;s pecuniary limit and was exclusively triable by the City Civil Court. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction under the Companies Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97940</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay, in a case concerning rectification of a company&#039;s register of members, addressed the jurisdictional issue of a suit valued at Rs. 1,300 under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court clarified that despite the availability of a summary procedure under section 155, a civil suit remained the primary remedy for such relief. Rejecting the notion to treat the suit as a petition under section 155, the court emphasized the importance of pecuniary jurisdiction, determining that the suit fell below the High Court&#039;s pecuniary limit and was exclusively triable by the City Civil Court. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction under the Companies Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>