<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 535 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97938</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on blow bar and breaker bar used in the mining area depended on whether mining and limestone crushing were sufficiently connected with cement manufacture, and whether the mining premises formed part of the factory under excise law. The article notes that the tribunal considered the statutory definition of factory, the registration and licensing framework, and the earlier Larger Bench ruling, but found that the status of the mining area as licensed premises and part of the factory had not been fully examined. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 535 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97938</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on blow bar and breaker bar used in the mining area depended on whether mining and limestone crushing were sufficiently connected with cement manufacture, and whether the mining premises formed part of the factory under excise law. The article notes that the tribunal considered the statutory definition of factory, the registration and licensing framework, and the earlier Larger Bench ruling, but found that the status of the mining area as licensed premises and part of the factory had not been fully examined. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>