<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 532 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97935</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal of gudakhu was inferred from unexplained excess raw material, contradictory explanations for stock shortage, late-produced return documents, supplier denials, and discrepancies suggesting fabricated supporting bills and letters. The Tribunal held that these circumstances sufficiently established unaccounted use of tobacco powder and sustained the duty demand. On penalty, it accepted the demand but reduced the penalty on the proprietary concern in light of the overall facts, and held that no separate personal penalty was exigible against the proprietor merely in that capacity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:05:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 532 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97935</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal of gudakhu was inferred from unexplained excess raw material, contradictory explanations for stock shortage, late-produced return documents, supplier denials, and discrepancies suggesting fabricated supporting bills and letters. The Tribunal held that these circumstances sufficiently established unaccounted use of tobacco powder and sustained the duty demand. On penalty, it accepted the demand but reduced the penalty on the proprietary concern in light of the overall facts, and held that no separate personal penalty was exigible against the proprietor merely in that capacity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>