https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97929 A legal representative who obtained letters of administration and promptly sought registration in her own name could invoke rectification where the company failed to take lawful steps to consider the request; that inaction was treated as default attracting rectification of the register. A claim framed merely in the capacity of administratrix was not sustainable because notice of trust was barred, but the application remained maintainable because the petitioner sought registration as holder in her own right. The court also treated the appeal remedy as concurrent rather than exclusive, so it did not displace rectification jurisdiction. The register was directed to be corrected in favour of the petitioner. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:54:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97929 A legal representative who obtained letters of administration and promptly sought registration in her own name could invoke rectification where the company failed to take lawful steps to consider the request; that inaction was treated as default attracting rectification of the register. A claim framed merely in the capacity of administratrix was not sustainable because notice of trust was barred, but the application remained maintainable because the petitioner sought registration as holder in her own right. The court also treated the appeal remedy as concurrent rather than exclusive, so it did not displace rectification jurisdiction. The register was directed to be corrected in favour of the petitioner. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 08 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97929