<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (6) TMI 18 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97920</link>
    <description>A company in liquidation cannot itself obtain a declaration that a registrable charge is void for non-registration; the liquidator is the proper plaintiff because non-registration renders the charge void only as against the liquidator and creditors. The deposit of hire-purchase agreements created an equitable charge over the agreements&#039; benefits and, to the extent those benefits comprised present or future book-debts, such charges were registrable under Section 95 and attach when the debts arise. Unregistered charges of that character are therefore void as against the liquidator and relief including declaration of voidness and delivery up is warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:43:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (6) TMI 18 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97920</link>
      <description>A company in liquidation cannot itself obtain a declaration that a registrable charge is void for non-registration; the liquidator is the proper plaintiff because non-registration renders the charge void only as against the liquidator and creditors. The deposit of hire-purchase agreements created an equitable charge over the agreements&#039; benefits and, to the extent those benefits comprised present or future book-debts, such charges were registrable under Section 95 and attach when the debts arise. Unregistered charges of that character are therefore void as against the liquidator and relief including declaration of voidness and delivery up is warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>