https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97918 The court upheld the Delhi court's jurisdiction to try the offence under section 409 IPC, even though the offence was committed in Bombay. It found no misjoinder of charges against Dalmia and validated the trial. The court held that the funds in bank accounts constituted "property" under sections 405 and 409 IPC. Dalmia and Chokhani were deemed to have dominion over the funds, acting as agents under section 409 IPC. The court convicted them for conspiracy, deemed Dalmia's confessional statement admissible, and found evidence establishing his connection with Bharat Union Agencies Ltd. The court upheld the convictions and sentences, concluding that the trial was fair and lawful. en-us Thu, 05 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97918 The court upheld the Delhi court's jurisdiction to try the offence under section 409 IPC, even though the offence was committed in Bombay. It found no misjoinder of charges against Dalmia and validated the trial. The court held that the funds in bank accounts constituted "property" under sections 405 and 409 IPC. Dalmia and Chokhani were deemed to have dominion over the funds, acting as agents under section 409 IPC. The court convicted them for conspiracy, deemed Dalmia's confessional statement admissible, and found evidence establishing his connection with Bharat Union Agencies Ltd. The court upheld the convictions and sentences, concluding that the trial was fair and lawful. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 05 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97918