<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97911</link>
    <description>On winding up the court held that members (present and past) incur an ex lege liability to contribute for unpaid calls, such that the official liquidator may place defaulting shareholders on the list of contributories; this liability arises under the statute irrespective of earlier contractual limitations. The court further held that that statutory liability and the liquidator&#039;s right to require contribution on winding up are not defeated by ordinary limitation rules applicable to suits for recovery of calls, so the defence of limitation was unavailable to the respondents and the liquidator&#039;s claims were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:30:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97911</link>
      <description>On winding up the court held that members (present and past) incur an ex lege liability to contribute for unpaid calls, such that the official liquidator may place defaulting shareholders on the list of contributories; this liability arises under the statute irrespective of earlier contractual limitations. The court further held that that statutory liability and the liquidator&#039;s right to require contribution on winding up are not defeated by ordinary limitation rules applicable to suits for recovery of calls, so the defence of limitation was unavailable to the respondents and the liquidator&#039;s claims were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>