<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 443 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding no valid grounds for Customs&#039; enhancement of the price. The decision provided clarity on import valuation processes, emphasizing the significance of contemporaneous imports and the burden of proof on Customs to establish transaction value. The Tribunal determined that the price adjustment was valid, based on falling world-wide prices and mutual agreement between the parties, ultimately granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:24:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 443 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding no valid grounds for Customs&#039; enhancement of the price. The decision provided clarity on import valuation processes, emphasizing the significance of contemporaneous imports and the burden of proof on Customs to establish transaction value. The Tribunal determined that the price adjustment was valid, based on falling world-wide prices and mutual agreement between the parties, ultimately granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>