<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (12) TMI 43 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97903</link>
    <description>Validity of statutory transfer turned on whether the Controller lawfully sanctioned a modified scheme and whether that sanction conflicted with company-law or agent rights or article 14. The Court reasoned that where the approved scheme and shareholder resolution authorised subsequent modifications and directors could accept Controller-suggested changes, the Controller&#039;s hearings and sanction meant the modified scheme was effectively the notified scheme - sanction valid. The transfer was an exercise of a memorandum power to sell the undertaking and did not constitute unauthorised alteration, de facto winding up, or impermissible capital reduction; agent commission rights remain as claims against the company; no arbitrary discrimination of policy-holders was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (12) TMI 43 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97903</link>
      <description>Validity of statutory transfer turned on whether the Controller lawfully sanctioned a modified scheme and whether that sanction conflicted with company-law or agent rights or article 14. The Court reasoned that where the approved scheme and shareholder resolution authorised subsequent modifications and directors could accept Controller-suggested changes, the Controller&#039;s hearings and sanction meant the modified scheme was effectively the notified scheme - sanction valid. The transfer was an exercise of a memorandum power to sell the undertaking and did not constitute unauthorised alteration, de facto winding up, or impermissible capital reduction; agent commission rights remain as claims against the company; no arbitrary discrimination of policy-holders was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>