<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (12) TMI 41 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97900</link>
    <description>Directors irregularly cancelled a registered transferee&#039;s entry for 133 shares without notice or required formalities; the transferee had paid value and lacked notice of any informality, entitling him to protection under the indoor management rule. The cancellation was therefore illegal and the transferee&#039;s registration and rights were reinstated. Separately, the transferor ceased to be a member on registration and was not a necessary party to a suit for rectification and reinstatement; omission to implead the transferor did not bar the claim. An irregular act within corporate power cannot be annulled against an equitable transferee for value absent proper procedure and notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:18:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (12) TMI 41 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97900</link>
      <description>Directors irregularly cancelled a registered transferee&#039;s entry for 133 shares without notice or required formalities; the transferee had paid value and lacked notice of any informality, entitling him to protection under the indoor management rule. The cancellation was therefore illegal and the transferee&#039;s registration and rights were reinstated. Separately, the transferor ceased to be a member on registration and was not a necessary party to a suit for rectification and reinstatement; omission to implead the transferor did not bar the claim. An irregular act within corporate power cannot be annulled against an equitable transferee for value absent proper procedure and notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>