https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97896 Accidental omission to give meeting notice to nine members did not prevent a special resolution from satisfying the Companies Act, 1948 notice requirement. Section 141 required at least twenty-one days' notice duly given, while section 134 applied the Act's or articles' service provisions. Although the articles did not expressly address statutory compliance, article 75 provided that accidental omission or non-receipt of notice would not invalidate meeting proceedings. Treating the omission as accidental, article 75 meant the meeting was duly convened and the notice was duly given for the statutory purpose. The special resolution therefore remained duly passed. en-us Mon, 27 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:07:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97896 Accidental omission to give meeting notice to nine members did not prevent a special resolution from satisfying the Companies Act, 1948 notice requirement. Section 141 required at least twenty-one days' notice duly given, while section 134 applied the Act's or articles' service provisions. Although the articles did not expressly address statutory compliance, article 75 provided that accidental omission or non-receipt of notice would not invalidate meeting proceedings. Treating the omission as accidental, article 75 meant the meeting was duly convened and the notice was duly given for the statutory purpose. The special resolution therefore remained duly passed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 27 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97896