<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (11) TMI 36 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97896</link>
    <description>Accidental omission to notify nine members did not prevent a meeting from being treated as properly convened where the articles provided that accidental omission to give notice, or non-receipt of notice, would not invalidate the proceedings. Section 141 of the Companies Act, 1948 required a special resolution to be passed at a meeting of which at least twenty-one days&#039; notice had been duly given, and section 134 incorporated the statutory or article-based manner of service. The omission was held accidental, and the article was read as supporting due convening of the meeting despite that omission. The notice was therefore treated as duly given for the statutory purpose, and the special resolution was validly passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (11) TMI 36 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97896</link>
      <description>Accidental omission to notify nine members did not prevent a meeting from being treated as properly convened where the articles provided that accidental omission to give notice, or non-receipt of notice, would not invalidate the proceedings. Section 141 of the Companies Act, 1948 required a special resolution to be passed at a meeting of which at least twenty-one days&#039; notice had been duly given, and section 134 incorporated the statutory or article-based manner of service. The omission was held accidental, and the article was read as supporting due convening of the meeting despite that omission. The notice was therefore treated as duly given for the statutory purpose, and the special resolution was validly passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>