<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (11) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97895</link>
    <description>Expiry of the limitation period under Article 112 bars the remedy of a suit but does not extinguish a shareholder&#039;s statutory liability to pay unpaid calls that arises on a winding up order; the liquidator may enforce calls as statutory liabilities. A time limited relief provision with a ten year operative life cannot be extended by construing the saving clause to cover failure to apply within that period, so no relief is available after expiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:02:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (11) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97895</link>
      <description>Expiry of the limitation period under Article 112 bars the remedy of a suit but does not extinguish a shareholder&#039;s statutory liability to pay unpaid calls that arises on a winding up order; the liquidator may enforce calls as statutory liabilities. A time limited relief provision with a ten year operative life cannot be extended by construing the saving clause to cover failure to apply within that period, so no relief is available after expiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>