<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (10) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97892</link>
    <description>The article discusses liquidation-related issues concerning a company re-incorporated in India, including court jurisdiction, maintainability of petitions by voluntary liquidators, limitation for a fresh call on shareholders, preparation of the contributories list, admissibility of creditor claims, and justification of the call amount per share. It notes that the recognition of the company&#039;s Indian incorporation was treated as valid and that voluntary liquidators could make calls without prior court sanction. It also records that the petitions were treated as valid despite being initiated by one liquidator, the fresh call was regarded as within time, and the contributories and claim objections were not accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (10) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97892</link>
      <description>The article discusses liquidation-related issues concerning a company re-incorporated in India, including court jurisdiction, maintainability of petitions by voluntary liquidators, limitation for a fresh call on shareholders, preparation of the contributories list, admissibility of creditor claims, and justification of the call amount per share. It notes that the recognition of the company&#039;s Indian incorporation was treated as valid and that voluntary liquidators could make calls without prior court sanction. It also records that the petitions were treated as valid despite being initiated by one liquidator, the fresh call was regarded as within time, and the contributories and claim objections were not accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>