https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97892 The court upheld its jurisdiction over the matter, deemed the petition maintainable, validated the petition filed by one liquidator, ruled the call for payment of the call as timely, found compliance in drawing up the list of contributories, deemed claims against the company admissible, justified the call amount per share, and confirmed the shareholding status of respondents Nos. 2 and 9. The preliminary issues in both petitions were decided in favor of the petitioners, with further evidence scheduled for 1st December 1961. en-us Mon, 23 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97892 The court upheld its jurisdiction over the matter, deemed the petition maintainable, validated the petition filed by one liquidator, ruled the call for payment of the call as timely, found compliance in drawing up the list of contributories, deemed claims against the company admissible, justified the call amount per share, and confirmed the shareholding status of respondents Nos. 2 and 9. The preliminary issues in both petitions were decided in favor of the petitioners, with further evidence scheduled for 1st December 1961. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 23 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97892