https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97891 Conflicting co-ordinate Bench views on the classification of identical goods created an arguable case for reference to a Larger Bench, one view treating the goods as ayurvedic medicine and another as perfumed hair oil. In that situation, the requirement of pre-deposit was waived under the appellate deposit provision, and the Revenue was restrained from taking coercive recovery action until further orders. The appeals were directed to be placed before a Larger Bench for consideration of the classification dispute. en-us Tue, 29 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:54:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97891 Conflicting co-ordinate Bench views on the classification of identical goods created an arguable case for reference to a Larger Bench, one view treating the goods as ayurvedic medicine and another as perfumed hair oil. In that situation, the requirement of pre-deposit was waived under the appellate deposit provision, and the Revenue was restrained from taking coercive recovery action until further orders. The appeals were directed to be placed before a Larger Bench for consideration of the classification dispute. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97891