<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (10) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97890</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking a declaration that a transaction of shares was not affected by section 79 of the Companies Act. The company&#039;s reallotment of forfeited shares to managing agents at a discounted price was deemed to be issuing shares at a discount without court sanction, as required by the Act. The court held that the transaction did not comply with the provisions of section 79(2) of the Companies Act, rendering the reallotment of shares void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:53:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (10) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97890</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking a declaration that a transaction of shares was not affected by section 79 of the Companies Act. The company&#039;s reallotment of forfeited shares to managing agents at a discounted price was deemed to be issuing shares at a discount without court sanction, as required by the Act. The court held that the transaction did not comply with the provisions of section 79(2) of the Companies Act, rendering the reallotment of shares void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>