<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 516 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant evidence and processes to determine the correct classification and liability for excise duty. The appeals and cross-objections were disposed of, highlighting the need for a thorough reexamination of the issues raised by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 516 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant evidence and processes to determine the correct classification and liability for excise duty. The appeals and cross-objections were disposed of, highlighting the need for a thorough reexamination of the issues raised by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>