<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (9) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97882</link>
    <description>Article 20(3) protection against self-incrimination applies only where a person is an accused and is compelled to be a witness against himself. A proceeding under section 185 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 is a winding-up proceeding for delivery of company property or documents, not a criminal prosecution, so the person examined is not made an accused and may choose whether to appear. The privilege cannot be invoked in advance on a mere possibility of prejudice in a pending criminal case; it arises only when a specific incriminating question is asked. On that basis, Article 20(3) was held inapplicable to the section 185 proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (9) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97882</link>
      <description>Article 20(3) protection against self-incrimination applies only where a person is an accused and is compelled to be a witness against himself. A proceeding under section 185 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 is a winding-up proceeding for delivery of company property or documents, not a criminal prosecution, so the person examined is not made an accused and may choose whether to appear. The privilege cannot be invoked in advance on a mere possibility of prejudice in a pending criminal case; it arises only when a specific incriminating question is asked. On that basis, Article 20(3) was held inapplicable to the section 185 proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>