<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 501 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97867</link>
    <description>Rule 57S(8) permitted removal of moulds and dies without duty only with prior Commissioner permission and compliance with the prescribed terms, including return within the stipulated period. Where the assessee removed the goods on duty payment under Rule 57S(2), did not obtain prior permission, omitted material facts in the later application, and failed to receive the goods back within time, the statutory concession could not be extended. The cited precedent was distinguished because it depended on strict compliance with the relevant sub-rules. The refund claim was therefore not sustainable, and the benefit of Rule 57S(8) was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 501 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97867</link>
      <description>Rule 57S(8) permitted removal of moulds and dies without duty only with prior Commissioner permission and compliance with the prescribed terms, including return within the stipulated period. Where the assessee removed the goods on duty payment under Rule 57S(2), did not obtain prior permission, omitted material facts in the later application, and failed to receive the goods back within time, the statutory concession could not be extended. The cited precedent was distinguished because it depended on strict compliance with the relevant sub-rules. The refund claim was therefore not sustainable, and the benefit of Rule 57S(8) was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>