<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 495 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97861</link>
    <description>For valuation of molasses cleared to private buyers, the higher price charged to cooperative societies could not be adopted as assessable value absent evidence that the declared private sale price was not the full consideration or that the buyers were related to the assessee. The duty demand failed because the Revenue did not establish any favoured price element, undervaluation, or related-party relationship, so the private-party sale price remained the proper basis for assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 495 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97861</link>
      <description>For valuation of molasses cleared to private buyers, the higher price charged to cooperative societies could not be adopted as assessable value absent evidence that the declared private sale price was not the full consideration or that the buyers were related to the assessee. The duty demand failed because the Revenue did not establish any favoured price element, undervaluation, or related-party relationship, so the private-party sale price remained the proper basis for assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>