<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (3) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97857</link>
    <description>The court held that Rules 301 to 304 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, were ultra vires the Companies Act, 1956, as they impinged on the court&#039;s discretion under Section 462. Consequently, the court directed the Assistant Registrar (Company) to propose a new procedure for auditing liquidator&#039;s accounts, signaling the issuance of fresh administrative guidelines. An appeal against this decision was dismissed due to non-maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:16:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (3) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97857</link>
      <description>The court held that Rules 301 to 304 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, were ultra vires the Companies Act, 1956, as they impinged on the court&#039;s discretion under Section 462. Consequently, the court directed the Assistant Registrar (Company) to propose a new procedure for auditing liquidator&#039;s accounts, signaling the issuance of fresh administrative guidelines. An appeal against this decision was dismissed due to non-maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>