<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 486 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for customs duty but reduced the redemption fine and set aside the penalties imposed on the directors. The appeal of the directors was allowed, while the appeal of M/s. CET was partly allowed. The goods were ordered to be released upon payment of the reduced redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 486 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for customs duty but reduced the redemption fine and set aside the penalties imposed on the directors. The appeal of the directors was allowed, while the appeal of M/s. CET was partly allowed. The goods were ordered to be released upon payment of the reduced redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>