<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97845</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the letter of demand was properly served despite minor addressing errors, verification requirements were satisfied, the statutory notice was validly delivered even if refused, and the petitioning creditor&#039;s debt was not considered disputed due to a pending appeal. The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded, and the decision was certified for two counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:02:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97845</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the letter of demand was properly served despite minor addressing errors, verification requirements were satisfied, the statutory notice was validly delivered even if refused, and the petitioning creditor&#039;s debt was not considered disputed due to a pending appeal. The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded, and the decision was certified for two counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>