<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97838</link>
    <description>The note addresses Section 346&#039;s effect when a managing-agent is a firm: the Central Government may grant &quot;further time&quot; to defer the firm ceasing to act, and such further time governs the period of continuation regardless of whether all partners have applied for approval; approval must be accorded before expiry of the fixed period. Executive discretion to extend time is a jurisdictional act reviewable by courts only for want of jurisdiction; the government&#039;s two extensions were treated as valid. Parties who continued as managing agent and accepted the extensions are estopped from challenging them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:51:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97838</link>
      <description>The note addresses Section 346&#039;s effect when a managing-agent is a firm: the Central Government may grant &quot;further time&quot; to defer the firm ceasing to act, and such further time governs the period of continuation regardless of whether all partners have applied for approval; approval must be accorded before expiry of the fixed period. Executive discretion to extend time is a jurisdictional act reviewable by courts only for want of jurisdiction; the government&#039;s two extensions were treated as valid. Parties who continued as managing agent and accepted the extensions are estopped from challenging them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>