<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 464 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97831</link>
    <description>The appeal for condonation of delay in filing due to confusion in identifying the correct recipient of the penalty order was allowed. The appellant filed the appeal within three months of receiving the order, which was considered timely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 464 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97831</link>
      <description>The appeal for condonation of delay in filing due to confusion in identifying the correct recipient of the penalty order was allowed. The appellant filed the appeal within three months of receiving the order, which was considered timely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>