https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97828 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the District Judge's decision that the application under sections 216 and 235 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, was barred by limitation. The court rejected arguments regarding the applicability of section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, discretionary powers under section 235, and the terminus a quo for the limitation period. The court doubted the applicability of section 235 to the facts of the case, suggesting other legal remedies might be available. The appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:14:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97828 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the District Judge's decision that the application under sections 216 and 235 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, was barred by limitation. The court rejected arguments regarding the applicability of section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, discretionary powers under section 235, and the terminus a quo for the limitation period. The court doubted the applicability of section 235 to the facts of the case, suggesting other legal remedies might be available. The appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 14 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97828