<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (7) TMI 43 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97826</link>
    <description>Transfers of shares require compliance with stamp and delivery requirements: an unconditional offer accepted by conduct may complete a sale contract, but transfer deeds bearing uncancelled stamps are treated as unstamped and cannot validly effect transfer. The court held that the transfers by Gurdial and Vidya Vati were incomplete and invalid because the deeds were not properly stamped, while the transfer of Ram Dial&#039;s two shares was complete because the share scrips and transfer documents were delivered, and the prior pledge did not defeat transfer where redemption was possible. The operative principle is that share transfer completion depends on valid stamp duty compliance and, where required, delivery of the scrips.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:12:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (7) TMI 43 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97826</link>
      <description>Transfers of shares require compliance with stamp and delivery requirements: an unconditional offer accepted by conduct may complete a sale contract, but transfer deeds bearing uncancelled stamps are treated as unstamped and cannot validly effect transfer. The court held that the transfers by Gurdial and Vidya Vati were incomplete and invalid because the deeds were not properly stamped, while the transfer of Ram Dial&#039;s two shares was complete because the share scrips and transfer documents were delivered, and the prior pledge did not defeat transfer where redemption was possible. The operative principle is that share transfer completion depends on valid stamp duty compliance and, where required, delivery of the scrips.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>