<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 497 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97822</link>
    <description>Conversion of yarn in plain reel hanks into cone yarn was treated as manufacture because the process changed the form of the yarn and fell within the relevant tariff note; the challenge on merits therefore failed. Extended limitation could be invoked only on proof of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty, and on the record no such ingredients were established; the demand was therefore time barred. Penalty under section 11AC was not sustainable because the demand related to a period before that provision came into force. The matter thus resulted in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 497 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97822</link>
      <description>Conversion of yarn in plain reel hanks into cone yarn was treated as manufacture because the process changed the form of the yarn and fell within the relevant tariff note; the challenge on merits therefore failed. Extended limitation could be invoked only on proof of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty, and on the record no such ingredients were established; the demand was therefore time barred. Penalty under section 11AC was not sustainable because the demand related to a period before that provision came into force. The matter thus resulted in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>