<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 485 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97809</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi upheld a penalty imposed under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, reducing it to Rs. 5,000 from Rs. 1,00,000 for contravention of Rule 57Q. The penalty was imposed on the appellants for availing Modvat credit based on invoices issued six months prior, despite their argument of no malafide intention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:44:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 485 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97809</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi upheld a penalty imposed under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, reducing it to Rs. 5,000 from Rs. 1,00,000 for contravention of Rule 57Q. The penalty was imposed on the appellants for availing Modvat credit based on invoices issued six months prior, despite their argument of no malafide intention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>