https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97807 The Court declined to decide the validity of Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination (Amendment) Rules, 1997 at the interlocutory stage, since the issue of balance of convenience was still pending before the single Judge. To protect the Revenue, it imposed a temporary interim payment condition on the association members, with automatic discharge of the protection on non-compliance. No final ruling was given on the rule's vires, and the writ appeals were disposed of with liberty to seek early disposal before the single Judge after compliance. en-us Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:41:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97807 The Court declined to decide the validity of Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination (Amendment) Rules, 1997 at the interlocutory stage, since the issue of balance of convenience was still pending before the single Judge. To protect the Revenue, it imposed a temporary interim payment condition on the association members, with automatic discharge of the protection on non-compliance. No final ruling was given on the rule's vires, and the writ appeals were disposed of with liberty to seek early disposal before the single Judge after compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97807