<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 480 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97803</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals for remand, emphasizing the need for the adjudicating authority to re-examine the issue in compliance with the earlier order and grant sufficient opportunity to the party. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to issue a new order promptly, preferably within 60 days, stressing the importance of cooperation from both parties in the re-adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 480 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97803</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals for remand, emphasizing the need for the adjudicating authority to re-examine the issue in compliance with the earlier order and grant sufficient opportunity to the party. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to issue a new order promptly, preferably within 60 days, stressing the importance of cooperation from both parties in the re-adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>