https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97801 A 200-day delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the explanation of loss of papers and late procurement of documents did not cover the entire period. Although the papers were said to have been obtained in August 2000, no satisfactory reason was given for the further delay of more than two and a half months before filing. The material placed before the Tribunal therefore did not establish sufficient cause for the whole delay, and the condonation application failed. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:24:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97801 A 200-day delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the explanation of loss of papers and late procurement of documents did not cover the entire period. Although the papers were said to have been obtained in August 2000, no satisfactory reason was given for the further delay of more than two and a half months before filing. The material placed before the Tribunal therefore did not establish sufficient cause for the whole delay, and the condonation application failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97801