<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 476 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97800</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of TK-50 cartridges as recorded media under Heading 8524, remanding the case for valuation determination. Software licenses&#039; value was to be included in recorded media valuation. E-mail transfers of PAK information were not subject to import duty. Penalties under Sections 111(m) and 112(a)(v) were contingent on valuation outcomes. The case was remanded for penalty and confiscation reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 476 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97800</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of TK-50 cartridges as recorded media under Heading 8524, remanding the case for valuation determination. Software licenses&#039; value was to be included in recorded media valuation. E-mail transfers of PAK information were not subject to import duty. Penalties under Sections 111(m) and 112(a)(v) were contingent on valuation outcomes. The case was remanded for penalty and confiscation reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>