<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 473 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97797</link>
    <description>Royalty and technical know-how/basic engineering fees under a collaboration agreement are includible in customs assessable value only when they are sufficiently related to the imported goods; payments tied to setting up the plant or to locally manufactured products are excluded. Valuation based on allegedly comparable imports was rejected where the goods were not comparable in description, use, quantity or commercial context, and the declared transaction value was supported by later identical imports at the same price. After termination of the collaboration, imports could not automatically be treated as related-person transactions and had to be examined independently under the valuation rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 473 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97797</link>
      <description>Royalty and technical know-how/basic engineering fees under a collaboration agreement are includible in customs assessable value only when they are sufficiently related to the imported goods; payments tied to setting up the plant or to locally manufactured products are excluded. Valuation based on allegedly comparable imports was rejected where the goods were not comparable in description, use, quantity or commercial context, and the declared transaction value was supported by later identical imports at the same price. After termination of the collaboration, imports could not automatically be treated as related-person transactions and had to be examined independently under the valuation rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>