<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (2) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97791</link>
    <description>Whether a tax authority may effect statutory set-off of an assessed refund against a tax demand proved and admitted as an ordinary unsecured claim in a company liquidation: the article explains that once a departmental demand is adjudicated and certified in liquidation it acquires the character and incidents of an unsecured debt under company and insolvency law, displacing pre-existing recovery remedies; permitting set-off under section 49E would confer preferential satisfaction contrary to the liquidation distribution scheme; outcome: set-off under section 49E is not available against a proved unsecured claim, and the refund must be dealt with under section 48 with the prior set-off orders quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (2) TMI 35 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97791</link>
      <description>Whether a tax authority may effect statutory set-off of an assessed refund against a tax demand proved and admitted as an ordinary unsecured claim in a company liquidation: the article explains that once a departmental demand is adjudicated and certified in liquidation it acquires the character and incidents of an unsecured debt under company and insolvency law, displacing pre-existing recovery remedies; permitting set-off under section 49E would confer preferential satisfaction contrary to the liquidation distribution scheme; outcome: set-off under section 49E is not available against a proved unsecured claim, and the refund must be dealt with under section 48 with the prior set-off orders quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>