<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (1) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97784</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming that the appellant&#039;s claim for remuneration beyond three years prior to the winding-up order is barred by limitation. The contentions regarding exclusion of time under Section 14, creation of a charge on the company&#039;s assets, and acknowledgment of liability under Section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act were all rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:57:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (1) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97784</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming that the appellant&#039;s claim for remuneration beyond three years prior to the winding-up order is barred by limitation. The contentions regarding exclusion of time under Section 14, creation of a charge on the company&#039;s assets, and acknowledgment of liability under Section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act were all rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>