https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97784 A claim for managing agency remuneration beyond the three-year limitation period was held barred because exclusion under section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act was unavailable where the earlier suit was on a different cause of action and had been decided on the merits, not dismissed for defect of jurisdiction or a similar cause. The remuneration claim was treated as a simple money claim, and the managing agency clause did not create any charge over company assets. Reliance on section 19 also failed because the alleged acknowledgment was signed by the appellant himself and did not show that he was duly authorised to acknowledge the company's liability on its behalf. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:57:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97784 A claim for managing agency remuneration beyond the three-year limitation period was held barred because exclusion under section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act was unavailable where the earlier suit was on a different cause of action and had been decided on the merits, not dismissed for defect of jurisdiction or a similar cause. The remuneration claim was treated as a simple money claim, and the managing agency clause did not create any charge over company assets. Reliance on section 19 also failed because the alleged acknowledgment was signed by the appellant himself and did not show that he was duly authorised to acknowledge the company's liability on its behalf. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 25 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97784