<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (12) TMI 42 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97779</link>
    <description>A compulsory winding-up petition was refused where the majority in value of creditors reasonably opposed liquidation and the company demonstrated assets and realistic prospects for continuing the business; the petitioner had not exhausted execution remedies and had offered structured repayment, and no special circumstances overrode creditor preference. The court treated majority opposition as highly persuasive though not conclusive when exercising discretion under the statutory winding-up regime. Following established practice, the court made no order as to the petitioning creditor&#039;s costs when a statutory right to wind up was defeated by majority creditor opposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (12) TMI 42 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97779</link>
      <description>A compulsory winding-up petition was refused where the majority in value of creditors reasonably opposed liquidation and the company demonstrated assets and realistic prospects for continuing the business; the petitioner had not exhausted execution remedies and had offered structured repayment, and no special circumstances overrode creditor preference. The court treated majority opposition as highly persuasive though not conclusive when exercising discretion under the statutory winding-up regime. Following established practice, the court made no order as to the petitioning creditor&#039;s costs when a statutory right to wind up was defeated by majority creditor opposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>