<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 604 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97778</link>
    <description>Forklifts used within a factory for shifting materials during the manufacturing process qualify as capital goods for Modvat credit when covered by binding co-ordinate Bench precedent. Applying judicial discipline, the Tribunal followed earlier decisions that treated such intra-factory material-handling equipment as admissible for credit. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the order allowing Modvat credit on the forklift was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 604 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97778</link>
      <description>Forklifts used within a factory for shifting materials during the manufacturing process qualify as capital goods for Modvat credit when covered by binding co-ordinate Bench precedent. Applying judicial discipline, the Tribunal followed earlier decisions that treated such intra-factory material-handling equipment as admissible for credit. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the order allowing Modvat credit on the forklift was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>