<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 601 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, dismissing the appeal and affirming the rejection of the refund claim under Section 27 of the Customs Act. The appellants&#039; failure to meet the specific conditions outlined in Notification No. 20/99 for exemption regarding the import of electronic total stations for topographical survey led to the denial of their claim. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a strict interpretation of exemption notifications and concluded that the appellants did not qualify for the exemption under the provided criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:30:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 601 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, dismissing the appeal and affirming the rejection of the refund claim under Section 27 of the Customs Act. The appellants&#039; failure to meet the specific conditions outlined in Notification No. 20/99 for exemption regarding the import of electronic total stations for topographical survey led to the denial of their claim. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a strict interpretation of exemption notifications and concluded that the appellants did not qualify for the exemption under the provided criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>